For much of the Twentieth Century, longleaf luminaries like James P. Barnett (pictured to the left - USFS SRS-187, Cover Photo J.P. Barnett) and many other forest professionals made substantial efforts to develop direct seeding techniques for regenerating the iconic tree, including the use of aircraft and various land-based operations. Heavy predation losses from birds, rodents, and insects, however, overtaxed seed sources and generally made direct seeding unreliable. As an interesting aside, Canadian foresters at about the same time tried using what they called “biodegradable” seed shelters for regenerating conifer species in the boreal forests but vegetative fouling, the expense of the plastics chosen, complexity of the design, and labor requirements combined to result in the efforts being abandoned. As recently as 2006, graduate researchers in Montana showed that combining seed planting techniques that mimic bird caches with large cage shelters produced germination and survival rates competitive with nursery stock. Although these and a few other techniques found a measure of success, direct seeding has all but vanished as a reforestation tool and, as a result, longleaf and other keystone tree species are regenerated today almost exclusively with planted seedlings started either in containers or bareroot beds.
The site preparation expense and various logistical requirements of these standard methods make reforestation impractical for many sites, especially those involving small acreage, difficult to access locations, or those motivated primarily by conservation objectives.
As we continue to learn more about the importance of keystone tree species to many habitat types, and as interest in conservation objectives grows among governments and nonprofit organizations, situations where planting nursery stock may be impractical represent a substantial missed regeneration opportunity.